Labor Law § 200 is the broadest of the three worker-protection statutes, codifying the common-law duty to provide a reasonably safe workplace. Unlike § 240's strict liability, a § 200 claim generally requires showing that the responsible party either created the dangerous condition or had notice of it and the authority to control the work or the site.
The free Accident Answer Engine walks through your situation and shows the legal issues, deadlines, and next steps that fit it. Open the Answer Engine →
How New York law applies
- Notice or control is required. Liability usually depends on whether the defendant created the hazard, or knew about it and had authority over the work or premises.
- Covers dangerous conditions and means/methods. It applies both to unsafe site conditions and to how the work itself was directed.
- Often pled with § 240/§ 241. § 200 frequently accompanies the other sections to capture hazards they don't reach.
Who may be responsible
Liability often reaches beyond the obvious. Depending on the facts, responsible parties can include:
- The property owner (with notice/control)
- The general contractor (with supervisory authority)
- A contractor that created the condition
- Your employer (through workers' compensation)
- Another party that controlled the means and methods
Deadlines that matter
A third-party construction case generally must be filed within three years, and a related wrongful-death claim within two years. Public projects can shorten these windows. Just as important, job sites change quickly — equipment and witnesses disappear — so prompt documentation matters.
What to do now
- Report the injury to your employer or supervisor in writing the same day, and start a workers' compensation claim to protect your benefits.
- Get medical care immediately and tell the provider exactly how the injury happened on the job.
- Write down which contractors were on site, what equipment was involved, and any safety device that was missing, broken, or not provided.
- Identify co-workers who saw what happened — job sites change fast and witnesses move on.
- Photograph the location, the equipment, and the conditions if you safely can.
Mistakes to avoid
A good case can be undercut in the first days. Watch for these:
- Assuming workers' compensation is your only option — a separate third-party case against a contractor, owner, or equipment maker is often available and can recover far more.
- Letting the job site get cleaned up or repaired before the conditions are documented.
- Giving a recorded statement to the site's insurer or signing forms you don't understand.
- Waiting to act — memories fade, workers leave, and key deadlines can be short.
What affects your case's value
No one can responsibly promise a number before reviewing your records. These are the factors that actually move it:
- Whether the defendant created or knew of the hazard
- The degree of control over the work
- Injury severity and permanence
- Lost earnings and future care
- Available insurance
This is general information about how injury claims are evaluated — not a valuation or prediction of any outcome.
Frequently asked questions
What does § 200 add to a case?
It captures hazards that § 240 and § 241(6) don't, based on the general duty to keep a worksite reasonably safe — but it requires showing notice or control.
Why is “control” so important?
Because § 200 liability typically depends on whether the owner or contractor created the danger or had the authority to fix it and failed to.
Is § 200 strict liability like § 240?
No. § 200 generally requires proof of notice or control, and ordinary negligence principles apply.
Can I bring § 200 with other claims?
Yes — it's commonly pled alongside § 240 and § 241(6) where the facts support more than one theory.